55 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Nass

Nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Handling - nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%

Schnee

Schnee
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Außengeräusch
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich