57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
4
28
24
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
2.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
67
302

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich AdvantageMichelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformanceContinental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Michelin Primacy 5Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich