57 Läden · 190.948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
5
1
15
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
2.2
1.0
9.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
40
63
66
226

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich