57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
23
3
24
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
40
176
36
302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen