Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

e.Primacy

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Anzahl der Tests

4

15

—

3

Optimale Position

#3

#2

—

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

9.0

—

3.3

Neuester Test

2025

—

2026

Verfügbare Größen

111

224

—

60

Nass

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Nassbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Aquaplaning - quer

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - längs

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Handling - nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Trockenbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Handling - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Außengeräusch

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rollwiderstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Kilometerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

e.Primacy

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen