56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Testprofil

Testprofil
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
12
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
6.1
5.8
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
530

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich