57 Shops · 184,262+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich