55 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian cLine VAN gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Testprofil
Nokian
cLine VAN
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
18
Optimale Position
#4
#8
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
4.0
13.6
6.1
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
16
146
47

Nass

Nass
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Nassbremsen
Nokian cLine VAN
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian cLine VAN
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian cLine VAN
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Nokian cLine VAN
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian cLine VAN
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian cLine VAN
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian cLine VAN
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian cLine VAN
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kilometerstand
Nokian cLine VAN
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich