Vergleich: Nokian cLine VAN gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

cLine VAN

R14 – R17

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Roadhawk

PremiumContact 6

7.6

R15 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

Turanza T005

Ventus S1 evo3 K127

Dynaxer HP4

Nass

Nokian cLine VAN

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

84%

Nassbremsen

Nokian cLine VAN

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Continental PremiumContact 6

91%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian cLine VAN

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian cLine VAN

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Continental PremiumContact 6

68%

Handling - nass

Nokian cLine VAN

56%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian cLine VAN

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Komfort

Nokian cLine VAN

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Außengeräusch

Nokian cLine VAN

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

Innengeräusche

Nokian cLine VAN

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Continental PremiumContact 6

80%

Kosten

Nokian cLine VAN

68%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Nokian cLine VAN

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Continental PremiumContact 6

83%

Kilometerstand

Nokian cLine VAN

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Continental PremiumContact 6

85%

Trocken

Nokian cLine VAN

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Continental PremiumContact 6

90%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian cLine VAN

58%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Continental PremiumContact 6

81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian cLine VAN gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

cLine VAN

Roadhawk

PremiumContact 6

Nass

Komfort

Kosten

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen