55 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian Line SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

Testprofil
Nokian
Line SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
5
21
13
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
4.2
11.9
13.6
Neuester Test
2017
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
33
161
146

Nass

Nass
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Nokian Line SUV
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Innengeräusche
Nokian Line SUV
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich