56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian Line SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

Testprofil
Nokian
Line SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
14
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
4.2
6.1
13.4
Neuester Test
2017
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
33
47
146

Nass

Nass
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich