56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

Testprofil
Nokian
Line
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
6
18
21
13
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#2
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
6.1
11.9
13.6
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
53
47
161
146

Nass

Nass
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Line
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Line
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Nokian Line
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Preis-Wert
Nokian Line
30%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Nokian Line
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Innengeräusche
Nokian Line
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Komfort
Nokian Line
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich