Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

5.9

R14 – R20

Auch vergleichen mit

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Testprofil

Line

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Anzahl der Tests

6

—

14

Optimale Position

#6

—

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.2

—

5.6

Neuester Test

2018

—

2023

Verfügbare Größen

53

—

Nass

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Handling - nass

Nokian Line

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian Line

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian Line

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Nassbremsen

Nokian Line

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Trocken

Nokian Line

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Handling - trocken

Nokian Line

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian Line

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian Line

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Nokian WetProof

63%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian Line

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Nokian WetProof

71%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian Line

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Kosten

Nokian Line

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Kilometerstand

Nokian Line

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian Line

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Nokian Line

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Komfort

Nokian Line

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Außengeräusch

Nokian Line

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Innengeräusche

Nokian Line

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian WetProof

69%

Komfort

Nokian Line

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Nokian WetProof

53%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof

Line

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen