57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
4
6
3
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
91
47
40
146
36

Nass

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich