Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Nass

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Nassbremsen

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Handling - nass

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Trocken

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Handling - trocken

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Komfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Außengeräusch

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Kosten

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Powerproof 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen