57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Wetproof SUV gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Wetproof SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
10
4
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.3
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2022
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
27
109
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian Wetproof SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Wetproof SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Wetproof SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Nokian Wetproof SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Wetproof SUV
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Offroad

Offroad
Nokian Wetproof SUV
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Wetproof SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Wetproof SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Wetproof SUV
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Wetproof SUV
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich