56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Preisvergleich | Vergleicher | Kontakt

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nokian WetProof

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

Falken

e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Nokian

WetProof

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken

e.Ziex

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

14

14

3

3

Optimale Position

#1

#8

#2

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

5.6

13.4

3.7

3.3

Neuester Test

2023

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

47

153

34

40

Nass

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Nassleistung

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trocken

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Trockenleistung

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Komfort

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen