Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

PremiumContact 7

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

94%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

97%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

58%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport

WetProof

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Potenza Sport

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen