Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen