Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterContact TS 870

9.9

R14 – R18

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

95%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

98%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

80%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

68%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870

WetProof

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterContact TS 870

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen