57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
3
15
4
18
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.6
3.7
6.1
3.3
6.1
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2026
2026
2024
Verfügbare Größen
47
36
229
40
47

Nass

Nass
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Handling - nass
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
Nokian WetProof
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WetProof
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Nokian WetProof
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Innengeräusche
Nokian WetProof
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Komfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WetProof
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Preis-Wert
Nokian WetProof
46%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich