Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

6.2

R14 – R20

Auch vergleichen mit

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian WetProof

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WetProof

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Nokian WetProof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen