Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Anzahl der Tests

14

—

3

—

Optimale Position

#1

—

#2

—

Durchschnittliche Position

5.6

—

3.7

—

Neuester Test

2023

—

2025

—

Verfügbare Größen

—

34

64

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WetProof

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen