Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian WetProof

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

WetProof

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen