Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Continental VanContact Winter gegen Firestone Roadhawk

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WR C3

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Continental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Roadhawk

5.7

R15 – R21

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

P ZERO PZ4

Nass

Nokian WR C3

31%

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WR C3

25%

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WR C3

25%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WR C3

33%

Continental VanContact Winter

92%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WR C3

33%

Continental VanContact Winter

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Handling - nass

Nokian WR C3

33%

Continental VanContact Winter

95%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Schnee

Nokian WR C3

96%

Continental VanContact Winter

85%

Trocken

Nokian WR C3

60%

Continental VanContact Winter

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WR C3

62%

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WR C3

53%

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Komfort

Nokian WR C3

62%

Continental VanContact Winter

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WR C3

81%

Continental VanContact Winter

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WR C3

50%

Continental VanContact Winter

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kosten

Nokian WR C3

43%

Continental VanContact Winter

43%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WR C3

43%

Continental VanContact Winter

43%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Continental VanContact Winter gegen Firestone Roadhawk

WR C3

VanContact Winter

Roadhawk

Nass

Schnee

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen