56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Testprofil
Nokian
WR C3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
Optimale Position
#7
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
Neuester Test
2018
Verfügbare Größen
23
64

Nass

Nass
Nokian WR C3
31%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WR C3
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Schnee

Schnee
Nokian WR C3
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WR C3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich