Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WR C3

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

WR C3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Turanza 6

Anzahl der Tests

1

—

4

12

Optimale Position

#7

—

#3

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

7.0

—

12.0

6.3

Neuester Test

2018

—

2025

Verfügbare Größen

23

—

111

225

Nass

Nokian WR C3

31%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WR C3

25%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WR C3

25%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WR C3

33%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WR C3

33%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Handling - nass

Nokian WR C3

33%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Schnee

Nokian WR C3

96%

Trocken

Nokian WR C3

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WR C3

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

78%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WR C3

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

82%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WR C3

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

84%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WR C3

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

71%

Komfort

Nokian WR C3

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WR C3

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

51%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WR C3

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Kosten

Nokian WR C3

43%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WR C3

43%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6

WR C3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Turanza 6

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen