56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Testprofil
Nokian
WR C3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
1
Optimale Position
#7
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2025
Verfügbare Größen
23
126

Nass

Nass
Nokian WR C3
31%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WR C3
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%

Schnee

Schnee
Nokian WR C3
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WR C3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Innengeräusche
Nokian WR C3
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich