56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Testprofil
Nokian
WR C3
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
Optimale Position
#7
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2018
2025
Verfügbare Größen
23
111

Nass

Nass
Nokian WR C3
31%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Schnee

Schnee
Nokian WR C3
96%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WR C3
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Nokian WR C3
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WR C3
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich