Vergleich: Sava Eskimo HP2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Budget

Sava

Eskimo HP2

VS

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofil

Eskimo HP2

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak 6

Anzahl der Tests

15

24

14

Optimale Position

#6

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

15.5

2.7

3.6

Neuester Test

2025

Verfügbare Größen

25

265

—

Schnee

Sava Eskimo HP2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Sava Eskimo HP2

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Schneetraktion

Sava Eskimo HP2

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Schnee Handling

Sava Eskimo HP2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Schnee Slalom

Sava Eskimo HP2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Schneeleistung

Sava Eskimo HP2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Trocken

Sava Eskimo HP2

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Trockenbremsen

Sava Eskimo HP2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Sava Eskimo HP2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

Handling - trocken

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Trockenleistung

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Nass

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

Sava Eskimo HP2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Nassbremsen

Sava Eskimo HP2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Handling - nass

Sava Eskimo HP2

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplaning - längs

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kreisbahn nass

Sava Eskimo HP2

59%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kosten

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kilometerstand

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Preis-Wert

Sava Eskimo HP2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Rollwiderstand

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Komfort

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Außengeräusch

Sava Eskimo HP2

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Innengeräusche

Sava Eskimo HP2

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Komfort

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Eis

Sava Eskimo HP2

85%

Eis bremsen

Sava Eskimo HP2

85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

Organisation	Jahreszeit	Jahr	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2025	225/40 R18	Ansehen
AUTOBILD	Winter	2024	205/55 R16	Ansehen

Vergleich: Sava Eskimo HP2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Eskimo HP2

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Schnee

Trocken

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Eis

Abmessungen und Preise

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen