Vergleich: Triangle EffeXWinter TW421 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Triangle

EffeXWinter TW421

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

EffeXWinter TW421

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

1

10

4

3

Optimale Position

#7

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

7.0

6.0

3.3

3.7

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

—

109

40

36

Nass

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Handling - nass

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - quer

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

25%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Trocken

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Schnee

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

52%

Kosten

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

44%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kilometerstand

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

18%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rollwiderstand

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Komfort

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste Schneereifen Reifen für Elektroautos Beste Eisreifen Beste Trockenhandling reifen Beste Regenreifen Die Leisesten reifen Die günstigsten reifen Beste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Auch vergleichen

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Vergleich: Triangle EffeXWinter TW421 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

EffeXWinter TW421

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Rankings entdecken

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

Auch vergleichen

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen