Vergleich: Uniroyal MS plus 77 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Obere-Mittelklasse

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - quer

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Kreisbahn nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - längs

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Handling - nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Nassbremsen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Schnee

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Schnee Handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Schneetraktion

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Schnee Slalom

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Schneeleistung

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Kosten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kilometerstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Rollwiderstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Preis-Wert

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Komfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Außengeräusch

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Komfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Innengeräusche

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Trocken

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Trockenbremsen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Handling - trocken

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Eis

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Eis bremsen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Eis seitenführung

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Uniroyal MS plus 77 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

MS plus 77

Ventus Prime 4

Blizzak LM-005

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Eis

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen