57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
4
4
6
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#3
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.3
3.3
12.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
23
40
111
146

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich