57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
1
5
4
5
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.7
1.0
2.2
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
36
66
63
40
63

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich