57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
1.3
12.0
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
40
23
111

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich