Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Laufenn G Fit 4S gegen GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

Cinturato All Season SF3

Quatrac

CrossClimate 2

Nass

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

81%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Nassbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

84%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

77%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

92%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

69%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Handling - nass

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

88%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Schnee

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

70%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Schneetraktion

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

75%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Viking FourTech Plus

81%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

84%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Schnee Slalom

Viking FourTech Plus

58%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

61%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Schnee Handling

Viking FourTech Plus

55%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

57%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Kosten

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

66%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Preis-Wert

Viking FourTech Plus

59%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

92%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Rollwiderstand

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

59%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Kilometerstand

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

67%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

72%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

73%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Handling - trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

88%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Trockenbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

56%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

51%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Außengeräusch

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Laufenn G Fit 4S

51%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

Organisation	Jahreszeit	Jahr	Dimension
AUTOBILD	Ganzjahresreifen	2024	225/50 R17	Ansehen

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Laufenn G Fit 4S gegen GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

FourTech Plus

G Fit 4S

Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

CrossClimate 2

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Trocken

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen