57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
3
24
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
40
36
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen