57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
10
4
5
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
6.0
3.3
4.8
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
109
40
158

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich