57 Shops · 184,262+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich