57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
5
10
18
4
5
Optimale Position
#11
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.0
6.1
3.3
4.8
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
109
47
40
158

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen