57 Shops · 184,262+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
75%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich