57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
36
6
4
3
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.1
4.7
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
303
146
40
36

Nass

Nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Nassfahrverhalten
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Trocken

Trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trockenleistung
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Preis-Wert
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich